kate.chem said:The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.
I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is. The document tells you about a sample somebody chose to send, at a moment in time, and nothing about the vial in your hand. Independent purchase-and-test is a different quality of evidence and everything else is inference.
Dr.CardioMD said:I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:
I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.
TrialNerd_Beth said:I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is.
Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in the refrigerator.
Day 1: 99.2% purity
Day 14: 98.6% purity
Day 28: 97.0% purity
Minimal degradation over 28 days when properly refrigerated. This confirms the standard 28-day beyond-use date is appropriate. Beyond 28 days, I'd reconstitute a fresh vial to be safe.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from Dr.RenalNash — and this may be the naive question:
Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?
Closing the loop on my own question.
Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.