🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see? Page 5

Has anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see?

SteveThurs Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:31 PM 36 replies 2,454 viewsPage 5 of 8
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
Feb 19, 2024 at 3:36 PM#21

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$143, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$233
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$103

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

25 23Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Feb 23, 2024 at 2:30 PM#22
PharmHunterJen said:
Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik: Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$143, 10-14 day turnaround…

Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.

26 24PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.LipidDallas
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Dallas, TX
Feb 27, 2024 at 1:21 PM#23
PharmHunterJen said:
Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik: Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$143, 10-14 day turnaround…

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.

27 0cory_ATX, lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.PathRoch
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Mar 2, 2024 at 12:10 PM#24

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Last edited: Mar 2, 2024 at 6:10 PM
28 1SaraMom3, Dr.MetabolicMD, RetaRick_CA and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
fiona_glasgow
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Glasgow, UK
Mar 6, 2024 at 10:57 AM#25

Following on from PharmHunterJen — and this may be the naive question:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

29 2NeuroNate, JessicaH_TX, KevinCompounds and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register