🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingSterility testing per USP <71> — need advice Page 2

Sterility testing per USP <71> — need advice

maya_sedona Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 1:10 PM 15 replies 1,956 viewsPage 2 of 3
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Aug 17, 2024 at 2:32 PM#6
mike_nyc said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is. The document tells you about a sample somebody chose to send, at a moment in time, and nothing about the vial in your hand. Independent purchase-and-test is a different quality of evidence and everything else is inference.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

21 16Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Aug 17, 2024 at 3:04 PM#7
maya_sedona said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$157, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$217
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$127

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

20 15dave_SLC, FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_nash
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Nashville, TN
Aug 17, 2024 at 3:36 PM#8
LibrarianMeg said:
I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 14.3 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 98.3%
Related substances: 0.4% (single impurity at 8.0 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.58 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

19 14mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD, sarah.morrison and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
JakeSmashed95
Member
412
1,890
Aug 2024
Arkansas
Online
Aug 17, 2024 at 4:08 PM#9

Following on from LipidDoc_ATL — and this may be the naive question:

Whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong?

18 13Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
maya_sedona
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Sedona, AZ
Aug 17, 2024 at 6:40 PM#10

Reporting back.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

22 20Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register