🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice Page 3

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

tyler_CSCS Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 3:54 AM 12 replies 1,823 viewsPage 3 of 3
BenResearch_OR
Senior Member
2,456
11,234
Dec 2023
Oregon
Nov 25, 2024 at 2:18 PM#11
VendorMark said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 3 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 98.2% to 99.0%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

28 1julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
Nov 25, 2024 at 8:14 PM#12
LipidDoc_ATL said:
One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable.

That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

Last edited: Nov 25, 2024 at 11:14 PM
29 2hank_denver, carlos_SATX, sophie_paris and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
Nov 26, 2024 at 2:10 AM#13
VendorMark said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$121, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$201
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$121

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

30 3BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy, emily_PDX and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Nov 26, 2024 at 8:06 AM#14
tyler_CSCS said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.6% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 12 business days.

The test costs ~$129 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

31 4kate.chem, DataDave, Dr.GutHealth and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Nov 26, 2024 at 2:02 PM#15

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

32 5PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register