🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingWhat even IS a COA and why should I care — my results so far Page 3

What even IS a COA and why should I care — my results so far

RunnerRach Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 11:36 AM 13 replies 1,672 viewsPage 3 of 3
paige_pharma
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Omaha, NE
Jan 10, 2025 at 10:38 PM#11
sophie_paris said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.

11 9rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Jan 11, 2025 at 8:13 AM#12

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

12 10dave_SLC, FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike.trainer_LA
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Apr 2024
Los Angeles, CA
Jan 11, 2025 at 5:47 PM#13
sarah_TO said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity.

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 5 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: Same-day local pickup
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 99.2% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 6 hours
Price: $154/month for semaglutide 1.7mg equivalent

13 11mia_MS2, LeilaHI, marcus_mpls and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
dave_SLC
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Salt Lake City, UT
Jan 12, 2025 at 3:21 AM#14
RunnerRach said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:

  • No HPLC data: If there's no chromatography graph, it's not a real COA
  • Exact 100% purity: Suspicious — real testing always shows slight variation
  • No batch number: Can't trace back to specific production
  • No endotoxin testing: For injectables, this is essential
  • Template looks like it was made in Word: Professional labs have standardized formats

I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.

Last edited: Jan 12, 2025 at 7:21 AM
14 12FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jan 12, 2025 at 12:55 PM#15

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

15 13PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register