🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingCOA red flag compilation — what worked for you? Page 4

COA red flag compilation — what worked for you?

PharmD_Rodriguez Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 6:03 PM 28 replies 1,920 viewsPage 4 of 6
Dr.PathRoch
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Feb 6, 2025 at 4:40 PM#16
LindaRN_retired said:
Shipping damage protocol for vendor vetting orders: if your package arrives with visible damage, temperature excursion, or broken vials: Photograph…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

21 19MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Feb 8, 2025 at 8:50 PM#17
dan_philly said:
Vendor reputation tracking for vendor vetting: I maintain a personal spreadsheet with every order I've placed — date, vendor, batch number, Janoshik…

That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

Last edited: Feb 9, 2025 at 12:50 AM
22 20raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO, pete_nash and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
paige_pharma
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Omaha, NE
Feb 11, 2025 at 12:59 AM#18
dan_philly said:
Vendor reputation tracking for vendor vetting: I maintain a personal spreadsheet with every order I've placed — date, vendor, batch number, Janoshik…

That reframing is the part I needed. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

23 21adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
claudia_zurich
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Zurich, CH
Feb 13, 2025 at 5:07 AM#19

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

24 22alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Feb 15, 2025 at 9:14 AM#20

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. No action needed from anybody.

Last edited: Feb 15, 2025 at 11:14 AM
46 19PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register