🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingLC-MS/MS vs HPLC for peptide analysis — November 2025 Page 3

LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for peptide analysis — November 2025

TrialTracker_MD Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 1:49 PM 39 replies 2,208 viewsPage 3 of 8
Dr.BariatricHTX
Senior Member
1,456
7,234
Feb 2024
Houston, TX
Apr 27, 2025 at 8:41 PM#11
rachel_ABQ said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$120, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$210
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$120

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

39 12CarlaRPh_TPA, steph_laguna, fiona_glasgow and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
Apr 28, 2025 at 4:20 AM#12
denise_HTX said:
One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

40 13Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
fiona_glasgow
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Glasgow, UK
Apr 28, 2025 at 11:59 AM#13
rachel_ABQ said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.7% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 10 business days.

The test costs ~$148 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

41 14KevinCompounds, TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
raj_cambridge
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
Cambridge, MA
Apr 28, 2025 at 7:38 PM#14
TrialTracker_MD said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 4 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 97.1% to 100.1%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

Last edited: Apr 28, 2025 at 8:38 PM
42 15PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Apr 29, 2025 at 3:17 AM#15

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. No action needed from anybody.

43 16PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register