LipidDoc_ATL said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
LipidDoc_ATL said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
quinn_sf said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
I read this differently from quinn_sf, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemquinn_sf said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
quinn_sf has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.