🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice Page 2

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Dr.PulmRoch Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 5:26 AM 16 replies 1,375 viewsPage 2 of 4
PurityPaulOR
Senior Member
1,890
7,890
Mar 2024
Oregon
Jul 31, 2025 at 6:24 PM#6
Dr.GastroMayo said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is. The document tells you about a sample somebody chose to send, at a moment in time, and nothing about the vial in your hand. Independent purchase-and-test is a different quality of evidence and everything else is inference.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

Last edited: Jul 31, 2025 at 9:24 PM
30 0Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Aug 1, 2025 at 9:11 AM#7
Dr.PulmRoch said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: Aug 1, 2025 at 2:11 PM
29 24stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Aug 1, 2025 at 11:59 PM#8
PurityPaulOR said:
I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is.

Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in the refrigerator.

Day 1: 100.1% purity
Day 14: 99.6% purity
Day 28: 98.1% purity

Minimal degradation over 28 days when properly refrigerated. This confirms the standard 28-day beyond-use date is appropriate. Beyond 28 days, I'd reconstitute a fresh vial to be safe.

28 23julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
MeganSA_TX
Member
634
2,890
Jun 2024
San Antonio, TX
Aug 2, 2025 at 2:47 PM#9

One thing that is still open after RunnerRach’s answer:

Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?

27 22TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Aug 5, 2025 at 1:50 PM#10

Closing the loop on my own question.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

43 16KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register