Monthly weigh-in thread — my results so far

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

jason_paloalto said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Following on from jason_paloalto — and this may be the naive question:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here.