🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHow to commission independent testing — need advice

How to commission independent testing — need advice

jennifer_SEA Sat, Oct 4, 2025 at 11:43 PM 13 replies 1,258 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 8 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
jennifer_SEA
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Seattle, WA
Oct 4, 2025 at 11:43 PM#1

Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

So the question, as narrowly as I can put it: why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe.

If the honest answer is that nobody knows, that is a useful answer and I would rather have it.

47 17lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
Oct 4, 2025 at 11:50 PM#2

Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

46 16ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
maria_elpaso
Member
312
1,456
Sep 2024
El Paso, TX
Oct 4, 2025 at 11:57 PM#3
CarlaRPh_TPA said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

45 15TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
FranDenver
Member
267
1,123
Oct 2024
Denver, CO
Oct 5, 2025 at 12:04 AM#4
jennifer_SEA said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

Same position here, arrived at the long way round. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

44 14MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Oct 5, 2025 at 12:41 AM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.7% purity, 0.3% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

43 13BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy, emily_PDX and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register