The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
One thing that is still open after Dr.NephBHM_UK’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
LabKate said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
I read this differently from LabKate, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsLabKate said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Reporting back.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.