🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingEndotoxin testing methods — what worked for you? Page 4

Endotoxin testing methods — what worked for you?

amsterdam_pete Sat, Jan 3, 2026 at 11:50 AM 22 replies 1,163 viewsPage 4 of 5
Dr.ObesityMed
VIP Member
3,456
19,234
Nov 2023
Denver, CO
Online
Jan 8, 2026 at 8:14 PM#16
pat_auckland said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.0% purity.

Second this. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

Last edited: Jan 9, 2026 at 2:14 AM
27 0EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
roxy_nash
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Nashville, TN
Jan 8, 2026 at 11:22 PM#17

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 3 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 97.2% to 99.4%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

28 1roxy_nash, tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Jan 9, 2026 at 2:30 AM#18
roxy_nash said:
Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis.

Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.

29 2HealthEcon_DC, PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Jan 9, 2026 at 5:38 AM#19
roxy_nash said:
Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 55 submitted tests:

  • 75% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 18% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 7% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

30 3ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jan 9, 2026 at 8:46 AM#20

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source.

2 0PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register