kevin_tulsa said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
kevin_tulsa said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after kevin_tulsa’s answer:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
lisa_labSD said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Pushing back on lisa_labSD here. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.