🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionTriathlon training while on tirzepatide — anyone have experience? Page 2

Triathlon training while on tirzepatide — anyone have experience?

Dr.PainCLE Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 1:33 AM 14 replies 2,049 viewsPage 2 of 3
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
Jun 26, 2024 at 10:18 PM#6
Dr.PainCLE said:
The GIP arm is doing real work rather than padding the label.

Dose-response modeling for tirzepatide: Emax model fitting to the STEP/SURMOUNT dose-finding data shows:

Semaglutide: ED50 ≈ 0.6mg, Emax ≈ -18%, Hill coefficient ≈ 1.3
Tirzepatide: ED50 ≈ 6mg, Emax ≈ -25%, Hill coefficient ≈ 1.5

Clinical implication: most patients achieve >80% of maximal response by the mid-range dose (1.7mg sema, 10mg tirz). Going to the maximum dose provides diminishing returns — possibly not worth the additional side effect burden for some patients. Individualize dosing based on response vs tolerability.

Last edited: Jun 27, 2024 at 1:18 AM
4 24pete_nash, hank_denver, carlos_SATX and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
B12Beth
Member
289
890
Oct 2024
Maryland
Jun 27, 2024 at 6:33 AM#7

One thing that is still open after KevinCompounds’s answer:

How much of the tirzepatide advantage is the GIP component and how much is simply that the dose ladder goes higher in receptor-occupancy terms?

3 23carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI, marco_milano
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.LeslieOBGYN
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Dallas, TX
Jun 27, 2024 at 2:48 PM#8
SleepDoc_PDX said:
Dose-response modeling for tirzepatide: Emax model fitting to the STEP/SURMOUNT dose-finding data shows: Semaglutide: ED50 ≈ 0.6mg, Emax ≈ -18%, Hill…

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale. It protects lean mass — which is the reason to do it — and it contributes modestly to the deficit, which is the reason people start and then quit when the arithmetic disappoints them. In a deep deficit, resistance work is the priority and high-volume cardio competes with recovery.

Worth separating that from training through weight loss, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

2 22james_edin, FranDenver
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
Jun 27, 2024 at 11:03 PM#9

Reporting back.

Reporting back after another eight months at the same dose. Still losing slowly, no new side effects, and no reason I can find to climb further.

Last edited: Jun 28, 2024 at 2:03 AM
1 21bbq_ray_KC
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MarkLI_maint
Member
534
2,345
Jun 2024
Long Island, NY
Jun 29, 2024 at 2:42 PM#10
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:
Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale.

True, though the ladder is longer and that is not a neutral detail — six dose steps means six opportunities to stall on the way up, and plenty of people never reach the dose the headline number came from.

Last edited: Jun 29, 2024 at 7:42 PM
45 18bri_stats, pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register