PedsEndoPhilly said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Following on from TirzTom — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsVendorMark said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Pushing back on VendorMark here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.