🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHow to commission independent testing — need advice Page 2

How to commission independent testing — need advice

lori_vegas Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 11:55 AM 11 replies 738 viewsPage 2 of 3
KevinCompounds
VIP Member
5,432
18,234
Dec 2023
Nevada
Mar 5, 2026 at 9:09 PM#6
InsuranceTom said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is. The document tells you about a sample somebody chose to send, at a moment in time, and nothing about the vial in your hand. Independent purchase-and-test is a different quality of evidence and everything else is inference.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

37 7jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS, VanRx_Mike and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Mar 6, 2026 at 12:48 AM#7
lori_vegas said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.4 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.5%
Related substances: 0.7% (single impurity at 10.3 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

Last edited: Mar 6, 2026 at 4:48 AM
36 6raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO, pete_nash and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Mar 6, 2026 at 4:27 AM#8
KevinCompounds said:
I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 59 submitted tests:

  • 75% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 18% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 7% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

Last edited: Mar 6, 2026 at 10:27 AM
35 5RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
dave_SLC
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Salt Lake City, UT
Mar 6, 2026 at 8:06 AM#9

One thing that is still open after sarah.morrison’s answer:

Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?

34 4FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lori_vegas
Member
378
1,678
Aug 2024
Las Vegas, NV
Mar 7, 2026 at 1:36 AM#10

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

22 20Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register