The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Closing the loop on my own question.
Second scan under matched conditions came back with the lean number nearly a kilogram higher than the first, so a chunk of what I panicked about was hydration. Strength numbers were up throughout.
PeptideSynthNJ said:Second scan under matched conditions came back with the lean number nearly a kilogram higher than the first, so a chunk of what I panicked about was…
Pushing back on PeptideSynthNJ here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsPeptideSynthNJ said:Second scan under matched conditions came back with the lean number nearly a kilogram higher than the first, so a chunk of what I panicked about was…
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
PeptideSynthNJ said:Second scan under matched conditions came back with the lean number nearly a kilogram higher than the first, so a chunk of what I panicked about was…
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.