🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingSterility testing per USP <71> — need advice Page 2

Sterility testing per USP <71> — need advice

Dr.RaviCardio Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 9:46 AM 13 replies 672 viewsPage 2 of 3
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Apr 9, 2026 at 10:16 PM#6
Dr.BariatricHTX said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is. The document tells you about a sample somebody chose to send, at a moment in time, and nothing about the vial in your hand. Independent purchase-and-test is a different quality of evidence and everything else is inference.

10 5Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Apr 10, 2026 at 3:13 AM#7
Dr.RaviCardio said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.3 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 98.5%
Related substances: 0.7% (single impurity at 10.2 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

9 4maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SportsMedIN
Senior Member
1,456
6,789
Feb 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Apr 10, 2026 at 8:11 AM#8
SarahChen_PharmD said:
I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$153, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$203
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$113

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

8 3adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Apr 10, 2026 at 1:09 PM#9

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong?

7 2fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RaviCardio
VIP Member
2,890
15,678
Jan 2024
New York, NY
Apr 11, 2026 at 12:58 PM#10

Reporting back.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

9 7jason_sac26, chris_chi24, tampaLisa73 and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register