One thing that is still open after Dr.EndoIndy’s answer:
What the dose-response curve actually looks like above 1.7mg, because the trial means hide how few people account for the extra loss?
One thing that is still open after Dr.EndoIndy’s answer:
What the dose-response curve actually looks like above 1.7mg, because the trial means hide how few people account for the extra loss?
GraceAZ_72 said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
I read this differently from GraceAZ_72, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
GraceAZ_72 said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemGraceAZ_72 said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.