🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionCreatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — looking for input Page 3

Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — looking for input

BethLabQueen Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:08 AM 51 replies 2,621 viewsPage 3 of 11
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Dec 19, 2024 at 11:05 PM#11
sean_dublin said:
Regarding lean mass: I accidentally injected my dose intramuscularly instead of subcutaneously last week (went in at wrong angle, too deep).

Bone density monitoring on lean mass: DEXA bone density at baseline and month 12.

Lumbar spine T-score: -0.8 → -0.6 (stable to slightly improved)
Femoral neck T-score: -0.13 → -0.7 (stable)

No significant bone loss despite 60 lbs of weight loss. Key factors: adequate calcium (1200mg/day), vitamin D (5000 IU/day), resistance training 3x/week, and adequate protein. Weight-bearing exercise is critical for maintaining bone density during rapid weight loss.

Last edited: Dec 20, 2024 at 4:05 AM
34 7mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MarkLI_maint
Member
534
2,345
Jun 2024
Long Island, NY
Dec 20, 2024 at 1:18 PM#12
roxy_nash said:
Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight.

Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.

35 8TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
anna.melb_AU
Member
678
2,890
Apr 2024
Melbourne, AU
Dec 21, 2024 at 3:32 AM#13
sean_dublin said:
Regarding lean mass: I accidentally injected my dose intramuscularly instead of subcutaneously last week (went in at wrong angle, too deep).
sean_dublin said:
...the muscle loss concern with lean mass...

This is a legitimate and well-studied concern. Let me put some numbers on it:

In STEP 1, approximately 39% of weight lost was lean mass. However, the Lundgren 2024 study showed that structured resistance training reduced this to ~25% lean mass loss.

Context matters: at BMI 35+, you're carrying excess lean mass to support the extra weight. Losing some lean mass is expected and not inherently harmful if you maintain adequate muscle function through exercise.

The solution isn't avoiding the medication — it's combining it with proper exercise and protein intake.

36 9emma_london, tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
PeptideSynthNJ
Member
234
1,234
Aug 2024
Princeton, NJ
Dec 21, 2024 at 5:46 PM#14
BethLabQueen said:
Two DEXA scans eleven months apart: down 24kg total, of which the scan says 6kg was lean.

OMG yes. lean mass + resistance training is the combo. Can confirm.

37 10MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Dec 22, 2024 at 8:00 AM#15

Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

38 11PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register