One thing that is still open after Dr.SportsMedIN’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
One thing that is still open after Dr.SportsMedIN’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
pam_stl said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
pam_stl said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochempam_stl said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.