GLP-1 and menstrual irregularity — my results so far

Dr.RenalNash said:

Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the…

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

Dr.NateNeph said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Pushing back on Dr.NateNeph here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

Reporting back.

Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction. Correcting it here rather than editing it away.