andrew_nyc said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Mine went the same way, slower. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
VendorMark said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsTinaHashiRN said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Carry on.