🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsSemaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy)Semaglutide and lean mass: DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 month update

Semaglutide and lean mass: DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 month update

BariatricNurseD Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 4:15 AM 7 replies 1,716 viewsPage 1 of 2
This thread is more than 18 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
BariatricNurseD
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Dallas, TX
Online
Nov 24, 2024 at 4:15 AM#1

Two DEXA scans eleven months apart: down 24kg total, of which the scan says 6kg was lean. I want to know whether that ratio is bad, normal, or simply what happens.

The question I want answered is whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount.

Tell me what I have not thought of.

45 15tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DebRD_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Nov 24, 2024 at 6:21 AM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate protein. Both numbers need a caveat that matters: "lean mass" on a DEXA is not muscle. It includes water, glycogen and the lean fraction of organs, and glycogen alone carries about three grams of water per gram. A large early lean drop is mostly the glycogen and water going, which is why the first scan flatters and the second is the honest one.

Last edited: Nov 24, 2024 at 10:21 AM
44 14RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FDA_TrackerJim
Senior Member
1,567
7,890
Feb 2024
Rockville, MD
Nov 24, 2024 at 8:27 AM#3
DebRD_ATL said:
The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate…

Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.

43 13MikeNYC_runner and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
nick_SD_fit
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
San Diego, CA
Nov 24, 2024 at 10:33 AM#4
BariatricNurseD said:
Two DEXA scans eleven months apart: down 24kg total, of which the scan says 6kg was lean.

Can confirm the pattern BariatricNurseD describes. There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see. Weight loss shifts fiber-type distribution toward Type I and improves mitochondrial density and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake per fiber — so the muscle you keep is metabolically better even though there is less of it. That does not make the loss irrelevant, but it explains why function often holds up better than the number suggests.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

Last edited: Nov 24, 2024 at 12:33 PM
42 12PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Nov 24, 2024 at 11:01 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

BariatricNurseD said:
...the muscle loss concern with lean mass...

This is a legitimate and well-studied concern. Let me put some numbers on it:

In STEP 1, approximately 39% of weight lost was lean mass. However, the Lundgren 2024 study showed that structured resistance training reduced this to ~25% lean mass loss.

Context matters: at BMI 35+, you're carrying excess lean mass to support the extra weight. Losing some lean mass is expected and not inherently harmful if you maintain adequate muscle function through exercise.

The solution isn't avoiding the medication — it's combining it with proper exercise and protein intake.

Last edited: Nov 25, 2024 at 1:01 AM
41 11RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

STEP 1-5 trials comprehensive summary — efficacy endpoints compiled12 replies
Oral semaglutide 50mg Phase 3 — OASIS program results16 replies
Semaglutide pharmacokinetics — half-life, Tmax, steady state modeling10 replies
Compounded semaglutide stability data — temperature and light sensitivity16 replies
0.25mg → 2.4mg titration: optimal schedule based on clinical data6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register