🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingEndotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C Page 2

Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C

LabKate Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 4:54 AM 17 replies 356 viewsPage 2 of 4
NicoleRaleigh
Member
356
1,567
Aug 2024
Raleigh, NC
Jun 8, 2026 at 6:39 AM#6
LabKate said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 15.5 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.7%
Related substances: 0.8% (single impurity at 9.5 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.6 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 7:39 AM
36 6InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL, SaraMom3 and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
steph_laguna
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Laguna Beach, CA
Jun 8, 2026 at 7:21 AM#7

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 1:21 PM
35 5GraceAZ_72, carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Jun 8, 2026 at 8:03 AM#8
NicoleRaleigh said:
My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed: Main peak retention time:…

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 64 submitted tests:

  • 85% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 10% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 5% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 11:03 AM
34 4DataDave, Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
LabKate
Senior Member
2,678
11,234
Jan 2024
Oregon
Jun 8, 2026 at 8:45 AM#9

Closing the loop on my own question.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

33 3emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseAsh_DET
Member
356
1,567
Sep 2024
Detroit, MI
Jun 8, 2026 at 12:06 PM#10
PharmacoVig_BOS said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

33 6emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
Janoshik vs in-house testing — third-party verification importance18 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register