🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOther Peptides & Research CompoundsIpamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience? Page 3

Ipamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience?

PedsEndoPhilly Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:05 PM 46 replies 2,741 viewsPage 3 of 10
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
Sep 12, 2024 at 8:37 AM#11
pat_auckland said:
I want to add the drug interaction perspective on the pharmacology.

That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.

41 14FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92 and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Sep 12, 2024 at 11:50 AM#12
MASHdoc_SA said:
The mechanism is more central than most summaries suggest.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

42 15hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Sep 12, 2024 at 3:03 PM#13
pat_auckland said:
I want to add the drug interaction perspective on the pharmacology.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.

Last edited: Sep 12, 2024 at 4:03 PM
43 16LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
dave_SLC
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Salt Lake City, UT
Sep 12, 2024 at 6:16 PM#14

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

44 17FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Sep 12, 2024 at 9:29 PM#15

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.

45 18PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

BPC-157 oral vs injectable — bioavailability review and evidence15 replies
TB-500 for tissue repair — mechanism and clinical evidence4 replies
Selank and Semax — anxiolytic peptides overview2 replies
CJC-1295/Ipamorelin combination — GH secretagogue discussion23 replies
BPC-157 + GLP-1 stacking for gut healing — N=1 experience17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register