🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHow to read a Certificate of Analysis — complete guide Page 15

How to read a Certificate of Analysis — complete guide

COA_Karl Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:00 PM 245 replies 11,691 viewsPage 15 of 20
mike_mealprep
Member
412
1,890
Jul 2024
Chicago, IL
Mar 26, 2024 at 1:17 PM#71
PeptideChemSF said:
If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

Last edited: Mar 26, 2024 at 7:17 PM
21 19mia_MS2, LeilaHI, marcus_mpls and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.ReproEndo
Senior Member
1,890
8,901
Jan 2024
Scottsdale, AZ
Mar 27, 2024 at 12:34 AM#72

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

22 20andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP, GraceAZ_72 and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mark_tokyo
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
Tokyo, JP
Mar 27, 2024 at 11:51 AM#73
Dr.ReproEndo said:
The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

Mine went the same way, slower.

Last edited: Mar 27, 2024 at 2:51 PM
23 21LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
BariatricNurseD
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Dallas, TX
Online
Mar 27, 2024 at 11:07 PM#74
Dr.ReproEndo said:
The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

24 22tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore, roxy_nash and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DerekSJ_a1c
Member
378
1,678
Aug 2024
San Jose, CA
Mar 28, 2024 at 10:23 AM#75

Old thread, but it comes up first when you search for this, so it is worth updating. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

Last edited: Mar 28, 2024 at 3:23 PM
25 23AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register