One thing that is still open after Dr.EndoIndy’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
DataDave said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
DataDave said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDataDave said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.