The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Feb 22, 2026 at 9:56 AM#21
Last edited: Feb 22, 2026 at 3:56 PM
12 10SallyK_inj, CryptoCarl, MariaRD and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Feb 23, 2026 at 12:13 PM#22
One thing that is still open after claudia_zurich’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Last edited: Feb 23, 2026 at 1:13 PM
13 11AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Feb 24, 2026 at 2:31 PM#23
HPLC_Greg said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Pushing back on HPLC_Greg here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
14 12HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg, bri_stats and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFeb 25, 2026 at 4:49 PM#24
HPLC_Greg said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
15 13Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Feb 26, 2026 at 7:08 PM#25
HPLC_Greg said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
16 14MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report