🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionStep count challenge — looking for input Page 2

Step count challenge — looking for input

lucas_SP_BR Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 9:32 PM 29 replies 1,475 viewsPage 2 of 6
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
Feb 2, 2026 at 11:20 PM#6
RetaRick_CA said:
There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see.

Pushing back on RetaRick_CA here. I think this board over-worries about lean mass. Some lean loss is obligatory — you need less muscle to move a smaller body, and preserving mass you no longer need is not a health outcome. The question is whether strength and function held, and mine did.

43 13emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Feb 3, 2026 at 12:02 AM#7
lucas_SP_BR said:
I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass.
lucas_SP_BR said:
...the muscle loss concern with lean mass...

This is a legitimate and well-studied concern. Let me put some numbers on it:

In STEP 1, approximately 39% of weight lost was lean mass. However, the Lundgren 2024 study showed that structured resistance training reduced this to ~25% lean mass loss.

Context matters: at BMI 35+, you're carrying excess lean mass to support the extra weight. Losing some lean mass is expected and not inherently harmful if you maintain adequate muscle function through exercise.

The solution isn't avoiding the medication — it's combining it with proper exercise and protein intake.

Last edited: Feb 3, 2026 at 3:02 AM
42 12VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Feb 3, 2026 at 12:44 AM#8
Dr.NutriCornell said:
I think this board over-worries about lean mass.

Body composition tracking via bioimpedance on lean mass (InBody scan every 3 months):

MetricBaselineMonth 3Month 6Month 9
Skeletal Muscle (lbs)75736973
Body Fat (lbs)107775547
Body Fat %41%33%28%20%
Visceral Fat (cm²)1721179262

Note: skeletal muscle mass dipped initially then recovered with consistent resistance training + high protein. The visceral fat reduction is where the metabolic magic happens.

41 11LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
maya_sedona
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Sedona, AZ
Feb 3, 2026 at 1:26 AM#9

One thing that is still open after BenResearch_OR’s answer:

Whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount?

40 10MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lucas_SP_BR
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
São Paulo, BR
Feb 3, 2026 at 4:46 AM#10

Reporting back.

Second scan under matched conditions came back with the lean number nearly a kilogram higher than the first, so a chunk of what I panicked about was hydration. Strength numbers were up throughout.

Last edited: Feb 3, 2026 at 6:46 AM
16 14tampaLisa73, KarenAZ_mom, zoe_NC and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register