🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMASH / Liver DiseaseMASH prevalence in GLP-1 users — my results so far Page 2

MASH prevalence in GLP-1 users — my results so far

roxy_nash Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 3:18 PM 6 replies 636 viewsPage 2 of 2
JessicaH_TX
Senior Member
4,123
13,456
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Apr 9, 2026 at 5:06 PM#6
HPLC_Greg said:
Liver ultrasound comparison for liver and MASH: my hepatologist ordered serial ultrasounds to track NAFLD regression.

Liver enzyme update related to liver and MASH: I had mildly elevated ALT/AST at baseline (likely NAFLD). After 11 months on GLP-1 therapy:

MarkerBaselineCurrentNormal Range
ALT77297-56 U/L
AST552710-40 U/L
GGT82399-48 U/L
ALP1027444-147 U/L

FibroScan also improved — liver stiffness from 10.5 kPa to 6.2 kPa. The evidence for GLP-1 agonists in NAFLD/NASH is very promising.

39 9wendy_avl, jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Apr 9, 2026 at 5:48 PM#7
roxy_nash said:
Fatty liver on an incidental scan two years ago and nobody followed it up.

Liver imaging follow-up for liver and MASH: FibroScan at baseline showed CAP score 330 dB/m (moderate steatosis) and stiffness 8.8 kPa (possible fibrosis). Diagnosed with NAFLD.

After 10 months: CAP dropped to 233 dB/m (minimal steatosis) and stiffness normalized to 5.1 kPa. Hepatologist says the liver is essentially healing itself as the metabolic stress resolves.

GLP-1 agonists may become first-line NASH therapy. The Phase 3 data on semaglutide for NASH is very promising.

38 8maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
julia.endo
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Feb 2024
Cincinnati, OH
Apr 9, 2026 at 6:30 PM#8
JessicaH_TX said:
Liver enzyme update related to liver and MASH: I had mildly elevated ALT/AST at baseline (likely NAFLD).

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

Last edited: Apr 10, 2026 at 12:30 AM
37 7hans_munich, jason_sac26, chris_chi24 and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.DermMIA
Member
456
2,123
May 2024
Miami, FL
Apr 9, 2026 at 7:12 PM#9

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

Last edited: Apr 9, 2026 at 9:12 PM
36 6PeptideChemSF, A1cHero_PHX, Dr.RenalNash and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
roxy_nash
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Nashville, TN
Apr 9, 2026 at 10:32 PM#10

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong. The measurement I was reading had moved less than its own week-to-week variation, which somebody said upthread and I did not believe.

40 13kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Survodutide MASH Phase 2b — histological improvement data9 replies
Semaglutide and MASH — liver fat reduction quantification13 replies
Non-invasive MASH biomarkers — FibroScan, ELF, FIB-4 on GLP-110 replies
ALT normalization rates on GLP-1 — pooled trial data20 replies
GLP-1 hepatoprotection — direct vs indirect mechanisms16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register