🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsSemaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy)Semaglutide and lean mass: DEXA scan longitudinal data — need advice

Semaglutide and lean mass: DEXA scan longitudinal data — need advice

wendy_avl Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 2:12 PM 8 replies 1,076 viewsPage 1 of 2
This thread is more than 6 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
wendy_avl
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Asheville, NC
Dec 8, 2025 at 2:12 PM#1

I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass. Not as much as I expected to, but the idea that training prevents it entirely is not what my scan says.

So the question, as narrowly as I can put it: whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount.

Tell me what I have not thought of.

2 22SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LipidDoc_ATL
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Atlanta, GA
Dec 8, 2025 at 4:37 PM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate protein. Both numbers need a caveat that matters: "lean mass" on a DEXA is not muscle. It includes water, glycogen and the lean fraction of organs, and glycogen alone carries about three grams of water per gram. A large early lean drop is mostly the glycogen and water going, which is why the first scan flatters and the second is the honest one.

1 21traveltech_sara
Reply Quote Save Share Report
rachel_ABQ
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Albuquerque, NM
Dec 8, 2025 at 7:02 PM#3
LipidDoc_ATL said:
The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate…

Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.

Last edited: Dec 9, 2025 at 12:02 AM
50 20AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
claudia_zurich
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Zurich, CH
Dec 8, 2025 at 9:27 PM#4
wendy_avl said:
I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see. Weight loss shifts fiber-type distribution toward Type I and improves mitochondrial density and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake per fiber — so the muscle you keep is metabolically better even though there is less of it. That does not make the loss irrelevant, but it explains why function often holds up better than the number suggests.

49 19alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
Dec 9, 2025 at 11:59 AM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

wendy_avl said:
...the muscle loss concern with lean mass...

This is a legitimate and well-studied concern. Let me put some numbers on it:

In STEP 1, approximately 39% of weight lost was lean mass. However, the Lundgren 2024 study showed that structured resistance training reduced this to ~25% lean mass loss.

Context matters: at BMI 35+, you're carrying excess lean mass to support the extra weight. Losing some lean mass is expected and not inherently harmful if you maintain adequate muscle function through exercise.

The solution isn't avoiding the medication — it's combining it with proper exercise and protein intake.

48 18mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

STEP 1-5 trials comprehensive summary — efficacy endpoints compiled12 replies
Oral semaglutide 50mg Phase 3 — OASIS program results16 replies
Semaglutide pharmacokinetics — half-life, Tmax, steady state modeling10 replies
Compounded semaglutide stability data — temperature and light sensitivity16 replies
0.25mg → 2.4mg titration: optimal schedule based on clinical data6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register