CarlaRPh_TPA said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
CarlaRPh_TPA said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
labquiet_amy said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after labquiet_amy’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?