PharmHunterJen said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
PharmHunterJen said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
PharmHunterJen said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Reporting back.
Update: the excursion was survivable and the vial was fine. I now keep a cheap fridge thermometer, which costs nothing and ends the argument.