One thing that is still open after LibrarianMeg’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
julia.endo said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
julia.endo said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemjulia.endo said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.