NauseaFreeNow said:Following this thread I went back and re-read the extension data properly.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
NauseaFreeNow said:Following this thread I went back and re-read the extension data properly.
Coming at NauseaFreeNow’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after NauseaFreeNow’s answer:
How much of the between-person variation is pharmacokinetic and how much is just adherence measured badly?
dan_philly said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I read this differently from dan_philly, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.