julia.endo said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
julia.endo said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from julia.endo — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Dr.PulmRoch said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.