🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOther Peptides & Research CompoundsIpamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience? Page 3

Ipamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience?

pat_auckland Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:26 PM 37 replies 1,157 viewsPage 3 of 8
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
Feb 3, 2026 at 9:31 AM#11
Dr.AddMedPHL said:
Amycretin (AMY/GLP-1 dual agonist) emerging data relevant to the pharmacology: Phase 1 showed -13.1% body weight at only 12 weeks, the fastest…

True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

7 5FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92 and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
dave_SLC
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Salt Lake City, UT
Feb 3, 2026 at 12:23 PM#12
Dr.DermMIA said:
The mechanism is more central than most summaries suggest.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

8 6NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Feb 3, 2026 at 3:15 PM#13
Dr.AddMedPHL said:
Amycretin (AMY/GLP-1 dual agonist) emerging data relevant to the pharmacology: Phase 1 showed -13.1% body weight at only 12 weeks, the fastest…

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

Happy to go further on any of that.

9 7LondonLisa, mike_nyc, VendorMark and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Feb 3, 2026 at 6:07 PM#14

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

Last edited: Feb 3, 2026 at 8:07 PM
10 8B12Beth, RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Feb 3, 2026 at 8:59 PM#15

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed.

11 9PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

BPC-157 oral vs injectable — bioavailability review and evidence15 replies
TB-500 for tissue repair — mechanism and clinical evidence4 replies
Selank and Semax — anxiolytic peptides overview2 replies
CJC-1295/Ipamorelin combination — GH secretagogue discussion23 replies
BPC-157 + GLP-1 stacking for gut healing — N=1 experience17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register