Dr.SleepRoch said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Dr.SleepRoch said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
ChrisMacros said:Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
Dr.SleepRoch said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.