Following on from sean_dublin — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Following on from sean_dublin — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Reporting back.
Closing this out. What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and worth saying anyway.
Dr.RaviCardio said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.RaviCardio said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.