LibrarianMeg said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
LibrarianMeg said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
LibrarianMeg said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
VendorMark said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
I read this differently from VendorMark, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.