MaxMetOK said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
MaxMetOK said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Coming at MaxMetOK’s question from a different direction. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after MaxMetOK’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
wendy_avl said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.