One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Following on from PharmacoVig_BOS — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
VendorMark said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Pushing back on VendorMark here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsVendorMark said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
VendorMark said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.