From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Dr.DermMIA said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.DermMIA said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
One thing that is still open after Dr.DermMIA’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?