🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVerified VendorsPureRawz tested at 91% purity on Janoshik — May 2025

PureRawz tested at 91% purity on Janoshik — May 2025

amy_econ_NJ Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 4:27 AM 6 replies 1,344 viewsPage 1 of 2
This thread is more than 10 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
amy_econ_NJ
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Princeton, NJ
Jul 21, 2025 at 4:27 AM#1
I've been sending samples to Janoshik religiously for 2 years and I think my personal dataset is now large enough to be genuinely useful. Here's every result I've gotten, organized by vendor. METHODOLOGY: - All tests: Janoshik HPLC purity analysis + peptide identity confirmation - All samples: random vial from each order, no cherry-picking - Cost per test: $135 (basic) or $220 (full panel — I switched to full panel in 2025) - Total spent on testing: approximately $3,800 over 2 years --- QSC SEMAGLUTIDE 5mg (n=11): | Date | Batch | Purity | Report # | |------|-------|--------|----------| | Mar 2024 | QSC-SEM-2024-0301 | 97.4% | JNK-2024-08832 | | May 2024 | QSC-SEM-2024-0415 | 98.1% | JNK-2024-12105 | | Jul 2024 | QSC-SEM-2024-0622 | 97.8% | JNK-2024-16433 | | Sep 2024 | QSC-SEM-2024-0810 | 96.9% | JNK-2024-20114 | | Nov 2024 | QSC-SEM-2024-1003 | 98.3% | JNK-2024-24567 | | Jan 2025 | QSC-SEM-2025-0105 | 97.6% | JNK-2025-01988 | | Apr 2025 | QSC-SEM-2025-0312 | 98.4% | JNK-2025-08234 | | Jul 2025 | QSC-SEM-2025-0618 | 97.2% | JNK-2025-15601 | | Oct 2025 | QSC-SEM-2025-0901 | 98.0% | JNK-2025-22489 | | Jan 2026 | QSC-SEM-2026-0108 | 97.5% | JNK-2026-02156 | | Jun 2026 | QSC-SEM-2026-0219 | 98.1% | JNK-2026-05344 | QSC Stats: Mean 97.75% | Median 97.8% | SD 0.45% | Range 96.9-98.4% --- WWB SEMAGLUTIDE 5mg (n=8): | Date | Batch | Purity | Report # | |------|-------|--------|----------| | Apr 2024 | WSB-SEM-2024-0388 | 98.2% | JNK-2024-10211 | | Jul 2024 | WSB-SEM-2024-0612 | 97.8% | JNK-2024-16890 | | Oct 2024 | WSB-SEM-2024-0905 | 98.4% | JNK-2024-22103 | | Jan 2025 | WSB-SEM-2025-0102 | 97.1% | JNK-2025-02344 | | May 2025 | WSB-SEM-2025-0418 | 98.6% | JNK-2025-10567 | | Aug 2025 | WSB-SEM-2025-0711 | 97.5% | JNK-2025-18290 | | Dec 2025 | WSB-SEM-2025-1104 | 98.0% | JNK-2025-26711 | | Feb 2026 | WSB-SEM-2026-0201 | 97.9% | JNK-2026-04102 | WWB Stats: Mean 97.94% | Median 97.95% | SD 0.47% | Range 97.1-98.6% --- GGPEPS SEMAGLUTIDE 5mg (n=6): | Date | Batch | Purity | Report # | |------|-------|--------|----------| | Jun 2024 | GYC-SEM-2024-0514 | 97.9% | JNK-2024-14556 | | Oct 2024 | GYC-SEM-2024-0823 | 96.8% | JNK-2024-21899 | | Feb 2025 | GYC-SEM-2025-0120 | 98.1% | JNK-2025-04512 | | Jun 2025 | GYC-SEM-2025-0509 | 97.4% | JNK-2025-13002 | | Oct 2025 | GYC-SEM-2025-0916 | 98.4% | JNK-2025-23156 | | Feb 2026 | GYC-SEM-2026-0128 | 97.6% | JNK-2026-03899 | GGPeps Stats: Mean 97.70% | Median 97.75% | SD 0.53% | Range 96.8-98.4% --- TIRZEPATIDE RESULTS (all vendors combined, n=7): | Vendor | Date | Purity | Report # | |--------|------|--------|----------| | QSC | Aug 2024 | 97.3% | JNK-2024-18234 | | QSC | Feb 2025 | 98.0% | JNK-2025-03788 | | GGPeps | Nov 2024 | 97.8% | JNK-2024-25011 | | GGPeps | May 2025 | 98.6% | JNK-2025-11345 | | GGPeps | Jan 2026 | 97.5% | JNK-2026-01890 | | WWB | Mar 2025 | 97.9% | JNK-2025-06744 | | WWB | Sep 2025 | 98.2% | JNK-2025-20533 | Tirz Stats: Mean 97.90% | Median 97.9% | SD 0.39% | Range 97.3-98.6% --- OVERALL CONCLUSIONS: 1. All three vendors produce consistently high-purity peptides 2. The statistical differences between vendors are not significant (p > 0.5 on ANOVA) 3. No vendor shows a trend of declining quality over time 4. Both semaglutide and tirzepatide show similar purity profiles 5. Every single test (n=32) has been ≥95%, the commonly cited pharmaceutical threshold 6. The $3,800 I've spent on testing has purchased peace of mind and community data that I consider well worth it
19 14Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
josh_phd_bmore
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Baltimore, MD
Jul 21, 2025 at 5:29 AM#2
This is gold, amy_econ_NJ. Thank you for your dedication to testing and data collection. A few analytical observations: 1. Low standard deviations (0.39-0.53%) across all vendors indicate tight manufacturing control. For comparison, published data on generic pharmaceutical peptides typically shows SD of 0.5-1.5%. 2. No temporal trend is really important. If we saw purity declining over time, that would suggest deteriorating manufacturing practices. The data shows no such trend for any vendor. 3. Tirzepatide purity is slightly higher on average (97.9%) than semaglutide (97.7-97.9%). This might seem counterintuitive since tirz is a more complex molecule, but it could reflect newer, more optimized synthesis routes. 4. The ANOVA non-significance confirms what we've suspected: all three verified vendors are drawing from essentially the same quality distribution. You could order from any of them with equal confidence in product quality. This dataset should be in the wiki permanently.
18 13Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Jul 21, 2025 at 6:31 AM#3
amy_econ_NJ, can I merge your data into the community testing database? Your dataset is one of the largest individual contributions I've seen. With your data added, our total community dataset would be: - QSC semaglutide: 53 tests - WWB semaglutide: 39 tests - GGPeps semaglutide: 30 tests - All tirz combined: 25 tests - Total: 147 independent Janoshik tests That's an incredibly robust dataset. At this point, the community has more independent quality data on these vendors than most generic pharmaceutical companies publish.
Last edited: Jul 21, 2025 at 10:31 AM
17 12TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
stefan_berlin
Member
234
1,123
Oct 2024
Berlin, DE
Jul 21, 2025 at 7:33 AM#4
bri_stats Absolutely, please merge it in! That's the whole point of sharing. The more data we have, the more confidence we can all have. I should mention — I'm a data analyst by profession (healthcare sector ironically), so obsessive data collection is kind of my thing. 😄 But I genuinely believe systematic testing is the single most important thing this community does. It's what separates us from sketchy forums where people just "trust" vendors.
Last edited: Jul 21, 2025 at 10:33 AM
16 11TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SleepRoch
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Rochester, MN
Jul 21, 2025 at 1:27 PM#5
32 tests at $135-220 each = $3,800 spent on testing. That's incredible dedication. I've only tested 3 times total and felt like I was being thorough. You're operating on another level. Genuine question: at what point do you feel confident enough in a vendor to reduce testing frequency? Like, after 11 QSC tests all coming back 97%+, do you ever think "ok, I probably don't need to test the next one"?
15 10roxy_nash, tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

WWB June 2026 batch — Janoshik results 99.1% semaglutide3 replies
GGPeps (GYC) tirzepatide — PeptideMeter grade A, 98.7% purity9 replies
QSC semaglutide US warehouse — 4 day delivery, 98.4% HPLC9 replies
WWB vs QSC vs GGPeps — which should I go with?18 replies
My first order from WWB — nervous but it arrived perfectly8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register