Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
KevinCompounds said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Following on from KevinCompounds — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?