Feb 7, 2025 at 6:52 PM#36
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
2 0MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Feb 10, 2025 at 12:35 PM#37
anders_CPH said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on anders_CPH here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Last edited: Feb 10, 2025 at 1:35 PM
3 1MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Feb 13, 2025 at 6:16 AM#38
anders_CPH said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
4 2rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFeb 15, 2025 at 11:55 PM#39
anders_CPH said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
5 3tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Feb 18, 2025 at 5:33 PM#40
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Worth separating that from the lipid panel, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.
Last edited: Feb 18, 2025 at 8:33 PM
27 0robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report