🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsClinical Trials & ResearchMonthly semaglutide depot formulation — my results so far Page 8

Monthly semaglutide depot formulation — my results so far

tony_orlando Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:23 PM 39 replies 2,686 viewsPage 8 of 8
SandraNC_45
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Charlotte, NC
Sep 10, 2024 at 1:13 PM#36

Following on from Dr.ObesityLA — and this may be the naive question:

How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?

34 7FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FitDadDave
Member
534
2,678
Jul 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Sep 13, 2024 at 7:15 AM#37
HPLC_Greg said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

35 8kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Sep 16, 2024 at 1:15 AM#38
HPLC_Greg said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

36 9RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
dan_philly
Member
456
2,123
Jul 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Sep 18, 2024 at 7:13 PM#39
HPLC_Greg said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

Last edited: Sep 18, 2024 at 10:13 PM
37 10Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Sep 21, 2024 at 1:10 PM#40

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

9 7cory_ATX, lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1678

Similar Threads

FLOW trial: semaglutide renal outcomes — NEJM publication review14 replies
SELECT trial: semaglutide 2.4mg cardiovascular outcomes — 4yr data9 replies
TRIUMPH program (retatrutide) — Phase 3 trial design and endpoints13 replies
Orforglipron ATTAIN trials — oral non-peptide GLP-1 agonist8 replies
CagriSema (amylin + semaglutide) — REDEFINE Phase 3 results20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register