Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsPharmD_Rodriguez said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Taking it to my next appointment.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again.